Choosing a 401(k) provider requires evaluating more than fees alone, making it important for HR teams to compare transparency, employee experience, compliance support, and long-term scalability.

Switching 401(k) providers requires careful planning, employee communication, and fiduciary oversight, making a structured transition checklist essential for HR teams managing the process.

Auto-enrollment can significantly improve 401(k) participation rates, but plan sponsors should understand contribution defaults, QDIA requirements, compliance rules, and employee communication obligations before implementing it.

The way employers communicate 401(k) benefits can play a major role in employee participation, retirement readiness, and long-term financial wellness.

Understanding your 408(b)(2) fee disclosure can help HR teams evaluate retirement plan costs, benchmark provider fees, and make more informed decisions about plan governance and employee benefits.

Choosing the right retirement plan depends on your company’s size, growth plans, and administrative needs, making it important to understand how SEP-IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, Solo 401(k)s, and traditional 401(k)s compare.

Understanding the differences between SEP-IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and 401(k) plans can help startups choose a retirement structure that aligns with company growth, employee needs, and long-term benefits strategy.

Understanding fiduciary responsibility can help small business plan sponsors better manage 401(k) oversight, reduce compliance risk, and build more transparent retirement benefit programs.

SECURE 2.0 introduced expanded tax credits designed to help small businesses reduce the cost of starting and contributing to a 401(k) plan.

Benchmarking your company’s 401(k) match can help HR teams evaluate whether retirement benefits remain competitive for recruiting, retention, participation, and long-term employee financial wellness.

Understanding 401(k) vesting schedules can help employers design retirement plans that balance employee retention, transparency, compliance, and long-term workforce goals.

Understanding the differences between profit sharing and 401(k) matching can help employers choose a retirement contribution strategy that aligns with company goals, employee expectations, and long-term plan flexibility.

Understanding how 401(k) employer matching works can help employees maximize retirement savings while helping employers build more competitive and engaging retirement benefits.

Properly documenting fiduciary decisions can help 401(k) plan sponsors strengthen governance processes, reduce compliance risk, and better prepare for potential DOL audits.

Understanding the difference between 3(21) and 3(38) fiduciary services can help plan sponsors make more informed decisions about investment oversight, compliance responsibilities, and retirement plan governance.

Managing a 401(k) plan comes with important fiduciary responsibilities, making it essential for employers to regularly review fees, investments, compliance processes, and participant outcomes.

Failed 401(k) nondiscrimination testing can create compliance challenges for employers, but understanding correction options like refunds, QNECs, and plan restructuring can help teams reduce risk and improve long-term plan stability.

Staying ahead of 401(k) compliance deadlines can help plan sponsors reduce administrative risk, avoid penalties, and keep retirement plans running smoothly throughout the year.

401(k) nondiscrimination testing helps ensure retirement plans remain fair across employee groups, making it important for HR teams to understand how testing works, why plans fail, and when a safe harbor structure may make sense.

Choosing the right safe harbor 401(k) match formula can help employers balance compliance, employee participation, retirement readiness, and long-term plan costs.

Learn the differences between safe harbor and traditional 401(k) plans, and when switching to a safe harbor structure may help employers simplify compliance, improve participation, and support long-term retirement goals.

Modern retirement platforms are reshaping the advisor experience through personalized investing tools, flexible retirement infrastructure, and technology designed to help advisors scale and better serve clients.

Modern retirement platforms do more than handle administration. They can influence how advisors scale personalization, manage investments, support clients, and grow their practice.

Personalization is reshaping retirement planning as employees increasingly expect investment strategies, technology, and financial experiences tailored to their individual goals and needs.

Retirement planning is evolving, and many advisors are reevaluating whether traditional retirement strategies still meet the expectations of today’s investors.

Financial advisors today are reevaluating whether traditional retirement platforms still provide the flexibility, transparency, and technology modern clients expect.

Learn how financial advisors use Basic Capital to deliver personalized retirement strategies, modernize plan management, and grow their practice with flexible retirement technology.

Today’s clients want more than portfolio management. They expect personalized strategies, better technology, and greater transparency from their financial advisors.

As the financial advisory industry becomes more competitive, advisors are looking for new ways to stand out through personalization, technology, and modern retirement strategies.

Retirement planning is evolving, and many advisors are reevaluating whether traditional retirement strategies still meet the expectations of today’s investors.

A plain-language guide for HR teams and plan sponsors on Safe Harbor 401(k) plan design, the three contribution formulas, and when it makes sense to adopt.

What today's landmark proposed rule means for plan sponsors, fiduciaries, and employees

The first AI built for proactive 401k compliance

Monitor contributions, catch compliance risks early, and keep participants engaged through real-time dashboards and automated tools

A practical timeline and step-by-step breakdown for employers navigating 401(k) provider conversions, from due diligence through post-migration support.

How employers can design retirement benefits that signal genuine long-term commitment to their workforce

A practical guide for plan sponsors

Discover which 401(k) providers offer alternative investments

How modern retirement platforms drive measurable ROI through higher participation rates, integrated financial wellness tools, and streamlined administration for lean HR teams

A step-by-step guide for plan sponsors to execute company-wide 401(k) migrations with minimal risk, maximum efficiency, and zero payroll disruption

Discover how plug-and-play 401(k) payroll integration saves 50%+ admin time

Automation tools that simplify 401(k) administration for small HR teams

Who is Basic Capital, and how do we make money?

How Gen‑Z Is Benefitmaxxing

by Abdul Al-Asaad

A crypto executive order analysis explains what it does and does not change for retirement plan sponsors, compliance, and regulatory outlook.

IRA versus employer plan fees guidance helps employers explain total cost differences and transparency expectations to participants.

Rollover versus transfer definitions for retirement accounts provide clear distinctions, timing guidance, and common pitfalls HR and finance should avoid.

Transferring a retirement account to Bitcoin clarifies rollover and transfer options and outlines practical constraints and tax considerations.

Founder/CEO Meanwhile

Co-Founder/CEO of Overjet

Template email to request crypto in a retirement plan provides copy paste language employees can use to open a constructive dialogue with benefits teams.

What Enterprise Consultants Should Know

Why crypto appears in retirement plans explains demand drivers, product availability, and participant choice trends that influence plan menus.

Risk controls for crypto in retirement plans cover caps, eligibility rules, and automated features to limit exposure and meet fiduciary duties.

Adding crypto to an investment policy statement offers practical steps to define objectives, risk limits, and review cadence for plan committees.

Due diligence questions for crypto retirement providers list essential topics to evaluate security, custody, and regulatory preparedness.

Fidelity crypto offering explains how a digital assets account works and outlines alternative provider approaches and tradeoffs for plan sponsors.

Crypto in retirement plans policy and process checklist gives employers a provider focused framework for governance, controls, and participant communications.

Bitcoin ETFs versus direct crypto compares vehicle differences, custody models, and sponsor obligations to guide investment menu decisions.

Bitcoin in retirement plans weighs potential benefits against custody, volatility, and fiduciary risks to help sponsors make informed policy choices.

Using retirement accounts for cryptocurrency explains feasible options for employees and HR and the compliance tradeoffs to consider.

Offering crypto in retirement plans outlines compliant strategies that align with ERISA and protect sponsors from undue risk.

Bitcoin in retirement plans explores employee eligibility, custody considerations, and fiduciary responsibilities for plan sponsors.

Discover the 2026 IRA and 401(k) limits, Roth catch-up rules, and what HR teams must do to stay compliant.

Blackout period checklist for retirement migrations highlights steps to protect participant access, recordkeeping, and communication during service interruptions.

Transition timeline guide outlines initial, interim, and steady state expectations after switching providers so HR can plan milestones and staffing.

Provider transition checklist for HR delivers a downloadable playbook of tasks, responsibilities, and compliance steps to manage a provider change efficiently.

Employee communication templates for provider changes include ready to use messages to keep staff informed and reduce questions during transitions.

The Emotional and Quantitative Measures That Shape Retirement

Moving to a new retirement provider step by step guide equips HR leaders with actionable tasks, documentation checklists, and communications to execute a smooth migration.

Guideline deconversion overview explains timelines, common blackout periods, and practical prep steps to reduce disruption for participants.

Guideline support changes guidance helps employers plan for continuity with tips on vendor escalation, knowledge transfer, and service overlaps.

Options for Guideline customers who do not use Gusto detail migration paths, vendor choices, and support steps to preserve participant experience.

Alternatives to Guideline for mid market employers compares pricing, flexibility, and support so you can choose the best retirement provider fit.

Switching retirement providers playbook gives HR leaders a no drama roadmap for moving plans with minimal disruption and clear milestones.

Gusto acquisition implications for employers cover support, pricing, and transition planning to help you assess service continuity and costs.

Guideline acquisition by Gusto is changing retirement plan options for employers, outlining key impacts and next steps to keep plans running smoothly.

Why the experience of retirement savings doesn’t always match the data

Employers need to know about 408(b)(2) disclosures to stay compliant and ensure their 401(k) plan fees are reasonable and clearly communicated.

A practical guide to 401(k) fee disclosures empowers employers to understand and communicate plan costs transparently to their teams.

Mid-market 401(k) benchmarks for companies with 250 to 1,999 employees reveal trends in fees and participation rates to help employers optimize their plans.

401(k) advantages for employers go beyond a check-the-box benefit, offering strategic value that can enhance employee retention and satisfaction.

Profit sharing versus 401(k) plan design presents tradeoffs for mid-market companies, so understanding each option helps employers choose the right retirement benefit.

Building a 401(k) RFP that gets real responses requires clear objectives and a downloadable template to streamline the provider selection process.

Balancing participant fees and employer fees is key to designing a 401(k) plan that attracts talent and supports long-term financial wellness for employees.

401(k) provider pricing includes both employer and employee costs, so understanding the true costs helps companies make informed decisions about their retirement plans.

Less noise. More progress.

Employers should pay attention to 401(k) fees using mid-market benchmarks to ensure their plan remains cost-effective and competitive for their workforce.

401(k) plan fees can vary as your business grows, so understanding how costs scale is crucial for employers seeking the best value for their retirement plans.

The largest 401(k) providers offer scale and experience, but mid-market employers should know how these advantages impact plan administration and participant outcomes.

How "Bogle's folly" became common sense

Mid-market employers evaluate 401(k) plan providers by comparing fees, investment options, and customer service to ensure the best retirement benefits for their teams.

What HR and Benefits Leaders Need to Know

Best 401(k) providers for mid-market companies deliver flexibility, transparent fees, and excellent support to help your organization maximize retirement plan value.

Top 401(k) providers for mid-sized employers offer competitive fees and robust support, making it essential to compare features before choosing the best fit for your business.

Maximizing 401(k) Benefits for Your Leadership Team

How It Impacts Your Workforce and How to Measure Success

How a Well-Designed 401(k) Can Transform Your Recruitment and Retention Strategy

Managing Retirement Programs Through Strategic Acquisitions

More options are great for investors, but are new strategies enough?

Basic Capital Closes $25 Million Series A Funding Round Led by Forerunner and Lux Capital

Delaying the 401(k) could be costing more than you realize.

If you care about your team’s future, a solid 401(k) does more than check a box.

Bare-minimum benefits don’t win hearts or save time. Here’s how to fix a plan that’s just checking the box.

If your benefits onboarding sounds like it was written by a toaster, it’s time to upgrade.

If you’re still formatting CSV files every pay period, it’s time to expect more from your provider.

Support your clients with a provider that takes implementation and maintenance seriously.

Several states now require retirement benefits. Here's how to avoid the fines (and the hassle).

From late remittances to confused employees, the burden lands on the same shoulders every time.

With half of owners nearing retirement, the future of their companies — and workers — hangs on what they do next.

Recruiters are adapting to a labor market that looks nothing like it did five years ago.

You shouldn’t have to build a new process from scratch each time.

The truth is, there’s nothing safeguarding you from making mistakes.

Some companies sell. Others stay. The difference comes down to what and who you believe in.

If you’ve spent time in capital markets, you’ve seen how wealth really gets built through time, structure, and smart allocation. Most employees don’t think in those terms. But with the right framing, they could.

A retirement plan should support the people who run it, instead of burning them out.

Our contribution tracker gives you real-time visibility into every stage of your money’s journey.

The days of mass interviews are behind us, but Rogers says too many companies still expect people to be perfect on day one.

“Above all, it’s about listening to your employees.”

The system we live with today was no accident. It was built, and it can be rebuilt.

Whether you're keeping tabs on policy circles or just retirement-curious, these seven newsletters are worth adding to the inbox.

Their in-depth coverage offers the first look at the product and its operations — and why it represents such a departure from how retirement accounts have traditionally worked.

In a system built around ownership, debt doesn’t have to be the enemy. It can be a tool.

The designated “silver trains” are slated to generate fast, dignified and inclusive travel to keep retirees active in healthy lives but also engaged with the nation’s economy.

The phrase emerged to simplify the public’s understanding of retirement planning, but today, the analogy no longer holds.

There’s a non-zero chance that one of them has your name on it.

More are on their way, so we’ll keep you posted.

It’s not that people won’t save. It’s that many simply can’t.

No amount of financial advice can prepare anyone who doesn’t have the funds to invest in the first place.

But the capital required to take advantage of these opportunities is not within reach.

What if the mortgage, the index fund, and limited liability protection came together in a single product?

Why do financing providers fund your Basic Capital instead of investing for themselves? And why offer limited liability funding with no personal guarantee?

We started Basic Capital to solve a simple problem: It takes money to make money

And how is it different from the traditional way of building wealth?

Why the truce that once existed between employers and workers unraveled.

Every time you contribute to Basic Capital via paycheck deduction, we take care of multiple steps behind the scenes.

The uber-wealthy have built a symbiotic relationship between their assets and loans—and it’s all thanks to private bankers.

Retirement accounts are an area hungry for innovation, and we believe there are creative, strategic and insightful HR and finance leaders with bold ideas on what to do.

How can employers find innovation in an industry that is slow to change?

We spoke with seven HR and finance leaders from industries ranging from marketing to transportation to health care on the main vehicle for retirement savings. Here’s what we learned.

No one likes to hear that “It takes money to make money,” but the old adage has never rang more true—because the sooner you get to $100,000, the faster you’ll get to that next $100,000 and beyond.